Prof. Stephen Bluestone
110B Ware Hall
Office telephone: 478-301-4010
Email:
Bluestone_SE@Mercer.edu
Web site: www.sbluestone.com
Office Hours: Tues/Thurs 9:30-10:40 a.m.; and by appt.
Texts: Hunter, The Norton
Introduction to Poetry
Fowler & Aaron, The Little, Brown Handbook (current
or a recent edition)
COURSE AIMS
The subject of this course is "The Study of Poetry." The
poetry we’ll study will be selected from the Hunter anthology
plus other sources. The main focus of the course will be on
developing an understanding of poetic form and technique. We’ll
look at the ways in which every poem is both a personal and a
general expression (for example, at how poems are related to
other poems) and at how language works in a poem. Though the
goals of the course are quite specific, the organization of the
course, at least for the first half of the semester, will be
loose. I prefer to teach poetry by going where the material
leads us, allowing it to surprise us as we study it. During the
second half of the semester, our schedule will become much
tighter. Class reports and reading material will be assigned on
a strict due-date basis. Throughout the course, assignments will
be given on a class-by-class basis.
Understand, however, that the amount of reading done will be
the same as the amount the class would do on a rigid schedule.
We’ll read a few selected poems closely in this class rather
than a large quantity of poems. But the reading list will be
open and flexible, since much that happens in a course like this
involves discovery and surprise. Often a discussion of a poem or
group of poems will take several class sessions, since new ideas
will lead to new insights and require more class time than
originally planned for the material. My goal in this class is to
have enjoyable and serious discussions that are open to
possibilities neither I nor my students can anticipate. One of
the charms of poetry is surprise, and a class on poetry should
be open to the unpredictable.
Class participation, preparation, quizzes, and attendance
(15%). Students are expected to attend every class and actively
contribute to discussion. There are no unexcused absences;
attendance will be taken at all classes, and I should be
notified in person or by e-mail, telephone, or note if an
absence is unavoidable. Students who do not participate in
discussion tend to place a burden on those who do. Therefore
participation in class discussion is essential. To further this
goal, preparation materials will be distributed at the time of
certain assignments, either directly or through download from my
Web site. These materials will then be completed and brought to
class. These prep sheets will be collected and graded. (See
attached sample with this syllabus.) In addition, quizzes on
material covered in class (terms, vocabulary, issues raised by
specific poems, etc.) will be given from time to time. I’ll
also, as specified, require that certain information be
downloaded from the Internet and brought to class as part of
class preparation.
Class contribution takes several forms. Students may ask
questions at any point during a class; students and teacher may
engage in question-and-answer sessions; the class as a whole may
engage in open discussion, sharing ideas and attempting as a
group to deepen our understanding of the material. Students
should work at participating effectively in all these formats.
Further note: Students with personal reasons for classroom
non-participation should contact me at the start of the
semester.
Oral presentations (25%) will be made to the class by
students of selected material. These presentations will occur
after mid-term and will be of a formal nature; they will cover
the following: (1) the biographical background of the poet
selected; (2) the form of the poem or poems discussed; (3) a
summary and evaluation of a scholarly article or chapter in a
book on the presented poem or poems; and (4) a general
discussion of the important issues raised by the poem or poems.
As part of the oral presentation presenters will be expected to
lead a class discussion. These presentations will be graded on
the basis of performance in the four categories just mentioned.
Written work (60%). Several critical papers will be
assigned on themes and topics to be discussed; one of these
papers (the final project) will be between eight and ten pages
and will involve scholarly research using at least two off-line
secondary critical sources. The final paper may be based on the
oral presentation (see above). The due date of the final paper
will be Thursday May 7, 2009, by 5 p.m. This paper may be
submitted earlier, at the student’s option.
In addition, extra-credit papers may be submitted from time
to time at the student’s option on subjects related to work in
the course. This is part of what I call "Making the case for the
‘A.’"
In any paper in which I specify research, the format of the
first sample student paper in The Little, Brown Handbook
in the chapter entitled "Two Research Papers in the MLA Style,"
is to be followed; bibliographic and "Works Cited" formats are
to be found in the chapter entitled "Using MLA Documentation and
Format." Any paper that has not been spell-checked or does not
follow the assigned formats will receive an automatic "F." All
corrections and editorial changes indicated by the instructor
must be made before the next paper is submitted and checked by
the instructor, otherwise no further work will be accepted and
the result will be an "F" in the course. As above, no exceptions
When a paper is submitted, it must be accompanied in a plain
tab folder by previous papers. All papers are due at the start
of class from the author on the specified due date; papers not
handed in on time will be penalized no less than one letter
grade per day. Please note: all previous written work submitted
for a grade, including extra-credit work, must accompany the
final paper in the folder at the end of the course.
The grading system. Grades on the papers (and in the
course) will not necessarily be averaged; much weight will be
given to improvement. Each student's written and class work will
be assessed on an individual basis, with emphasis on consistency
and the ability to achieve higher standards as the course
proceeds. I call this method of grading the "outcome basis." It
gives each student a chance to have his or her learning over the
course of the term count for more at the end. In my opinion,
this is a more accurate measure of learning in a literature
course than the averaging basis. I believe, in addition, that
this approach allows each individual student to make the
strongest possible case for an "A" by offering opportunities to
do extra-credit work (see above), which could consist of
response papers to poetry readings, short essays on subjects of
a student’s choosing that relate to issues raised in the course,
outside reading, etc.
On the other hand, if you wish to have your grades averaged,
you may select that option. This must be done at the start of
the semester by the second week of the class and cannot
subsequently be requested after that. The averaging basis weighs
all work numerically. It tells you where you are, but does not,
in my opinion, reflect your true learning curve, as the "outcome
basis’ does.
Note: it is course policy that all assigned work be completed
in order for a student to pass this course.
Further note: An optional final exam is available for those
who select it. In my opinion, only those students who feel they
are between grades should select this option. The grade on this
exam will be used to determine which of two grades (higher or
lower) the student will receive.
Conferences. These will be arranged as needed. I am
available to see you on a flexible basis and not necessarily
during fixed office hours. Let me know in advance, and we can
arrange appointments.
Special circumstances. Students with learning
disabilities that might affect grading in this course are
advised to notify the instructor at the start of the semester. |